Kansas and Missouri Electric Providers Express Concern Over New EPA Rules, Cite Potential Customer Cost Impact

Kansas, Missouri Electric Providers Weigh in on New EPA Rules With Potential Cost to Customers

Electricity providers in Kansas and Missouri have expressed concerns over the new rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that seek to mitigate pollution from fossil fuel-fired power plants. The EPA aims to curb 90% of greenhouse gas emissions at power plants by 2032, a move that has sparked apprehensions about potential cost implications for manufacturers, utilities, and customers.

Air of Discontent Among Power Suppliers

The Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives (AMEC), which serves Missouri’s 47 electric cooperatives, alarmed that such rules could pose a threat to the reliability of the American grid system. “The EPA’s mandate will result in more expensive and less reliable electricity for Missouri’s electric cooperatives and all electricity consumers,” stated Caleb Jones, the executive vice-president and CEO of AMEC. Jones added that the EPA’s reliance on the still-developing technology of carbon capture and sequestration to achieve the rule’s reduction targets is unreliable and expensive.

Kansas Powered by Concern

In Kansas, the statewide Kansas Electric Cooperative does not take things lightly either. They foresee a grim future where coal-fired plants will be forced to shut down by 2032 due to the new rules, significantly impacting the reliability of power sources that are consistently available. CEO Lee Tafanelli voiced concerns over the rising demand for electricity, beleiving that “the EPA underestimates the rules’ costs significantly and is ignoring our nation’s ongoing reliability challenges.”

A Collective Voice

Evergy, the region’s dominant utility company, supports the challenge against the EPA rule under the representation of the Edison Electric Institute(EEI). The EEI, representing a broad industry spectrum, joined litigation for the EPA’s New Clean Air Act Section 111 rules in May. In a shared concern, they expressed that the new rules could impact affordability and reliability.

Status of EPA’s New Rule

Amidst these concerns, the new EPA rule that proposes stricter standards for soot pollution is currently on hold across various states, awaiting the resolution of challenges in court.

Conclusion

On the surface, the stricter EPA rules are an aggressive step to combat climate change by significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, power providers in states like Kansas and Missouri perceive the measures as problematic, posing potential threats to electricity reliability and affordability. As these new regulations drawn from the environmental perspective enter the legal battleground, the future of the electricity sector’s affordability and reliability, and their subsequent impacts on customers, is yet unclear.