Kansas City’s New Youth Gun Law: What You Need to Know
Kansas City, Mo., has been buzzing with discussions since the new youth gun law went into effect. Recently, the legislature decided to override the executive’s veto, allowing the new local ordinance to kick in. But hold on—this change may not be here to stay!
Understanding the Ordinance
The Jackson County ordinance, known as Ordinance 5865, is pretty straightforward: it aims to prevent individuals under the age of 21 from buying certain highlighted firearms, specifically pistols and assault rifles. This move has sparked excitement among some and raised eyebrows among others.
Is It Legal?
Now, as exciting as this news sounds, there are whispers that the ordinance might face a state legal challenge. Allen Rostron, a Constitutional Law Scholar and Associate Dean at the law school in the area, points out a significant twist. He notes that state law has been quite clear since the 1980s, indicating that cities and counties cannot regulate firearms in a way that differs from what the state enforces.
“If you look at the terms of State Law, it seems to say that cities and counties can’t regulate firearms – it’s pretty clear about that,” Rostron explains. This seems to set the stage for a potential confrontation between local intentions and state regulations.
The Driving Force Behind the Ordinance
Jackson County Legislator Manny Abarca, the sponsor of this ordinance, is aware of the storm brewing on the legal front. He’s convinced that there will likely be a challenge, especially considering that federal law already prohibits juveniles from possessing firearms. According to Abarca, this ordinance aligns with that federal stance.
“The state in some wacky world seems to think that juveniles possessing firearms doesn’t end the way Kansas City is seeing the violence occur now,” Abarca remarked, highlighting his concerns about rising violence in the area.
Anticipating a Challenge
The potential legal battle could be led by Missouri’s Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who has been vocal about his stance on firearm rights. After the legislature voted to override the veto, Bailey expressed on social media that he will always protect Missourians’ right to keep and bear arms.
There’s also the chance that an individual under 21, charged with possessing a firearm outside their home or workplace, could challenge the ordinance in court. “They would be the defendant in a criminal case, and they would say, ‘I think this charge is invalid, because there’s a state law that says this regulation shouldn’t have been passed,” Rostron explains, illustrating another angle the law may be contested.
What’s Next?
As community members navigate this complex issue, many are left wondering what the future holds for the ordinance. Will Jackson County get to keep its new regulations, or will state laws override local efforts to enhance public safety? The uncertainty leaves room for lively discussions among residents.
Efforts to reach out for clarification from the Attorney General’s office and Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker’s office about the enforcement of the ordinance have not gone unanswered yet. As the legal landscape evolves, those involved are being urged to stay informed and engaged in the discussion.
Stay Tuned
The situation remains fluid, and Kansas City residents are encouraged to stay tuned for updates. As always, it’s crucial to understand the laws that govern our community and to be involved in conversations that affect public safety.
Whether you’re in support of the new ordinance or against it, one thing is for certain—the dialogue in Kansas City about youth gun laws is only just beginning!
